BBYY vs. DABS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DABS.

Performance

BBYY vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -19.06% return, which is significantly lower than DABS's 1.47% return.

BBYY

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 6.10%
• 6M: -25.86%
• YTD: -19.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DABS

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.03%
• 6M: 1.02%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF	$44.27K	$28.01K	$35.00K
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	$522.80K	$526.27K	$1.00M

BBYY vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF	-19.06%	-7.92%
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	1.47%	0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BBYY and DABS is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

BBYY vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DABS

DABS Risk / Return Rank: 85
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBYY vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBYY	DABS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.91	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.53	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.07	—

Drawdowns

BBYY vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and DABS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBYY	DABS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.11%	-1.47%	-31.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.74%	-0.24%	-27.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.53%	-0.29%	-15.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBYY	DABS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.63%	2.41%	+21.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.63%	2.51%	+21.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.63%	2.51%	+21.12%

BBYY vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBYY vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.87%, more than DABS's 4.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF	107.87%	21.98%
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.45%	3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBYY and DABS in my portfolio?

BBYY and DABS have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBYY or DABS?

On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBYY or DABS?

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBYY or DABS?

BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 107.87%, compared with 4.45% for DABS.

What is the main difference between BBYY and DABS?

BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.40% for DABS.