BBYY vs. RBIL
BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. BBYY is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
BBYY vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -19.06% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.
BBYY
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- 6M
- -25.86%
- YTD
- -19.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $44.27K | $28.01K | $35.00K | |
| $1.12M | $1.89M | $2.34M |
BBYY vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | -19.06% | -7.92% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.70% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBYY and RBIL is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBYY vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
BBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RBIL
BBYY vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBYY | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBYY vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBYY | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.11% | -0.56% | -32.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.74% | -0.13% | -27.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.53% | -0.08% | -15.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility
BBYY vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBYY | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.63% | 0.97% | +22.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 1.06% | +22.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 1.06% | +22.57% |
BBYY vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBYY vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.87%, more than RBIL's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | 107.87% | 21.98% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBYY and RBIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.
BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 107.87%, compared with 4.16% for RBIL.
BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.17% for RBIL.
Find the right allocation for BBYY and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer