PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBY.L vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBY.L vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBY.L is traded in GBp, while NEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBY.L achieves a 19.40% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BBY.L has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 16.44%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.39% annualized return.


BBY.L

1D
2.25%
1M
0.48%
YTD
19.40%
6M
19.82%
1Y
71.74%
3Y*
35.84%
5Y*
26.13%
10Y*
16.44%

NEM

1D
2.79%
1M
-13.66%
YTD
1.33%
6M
2.32%
1Y
77.13%
3Y*
33.39%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBY.L vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBY.L
Balfour Beatty plc
19.40%60.14%41.45%1.07%33.46%-1.39%5.28%7.22%-14.87%11.65%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.33%153.38%-6.22%-13.32%-11.35%8.42%36.16%25.55%-0.58%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BBY.L and NEM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

0.05

The correlation between BBY.L and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (10 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BBY.L:

£0.87

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

BBY.L:

9.64

NEM:

15.82

PEG Ratio

BBY.L:

0.25

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

BBY.L:

0.24

NEM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBY.L:

£17.72B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBY.L:

£872.00M

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

BBY.L:

£509.00M

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBY.L vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBY.L
BBY.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BBY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BBY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBY.L vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBY.LNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.31

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.67

3.04

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.85

8.69

+15.15

BBY.L vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBY.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBY.L and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBY.L vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBY.L drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -75.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBY.L and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBY.LNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.74%

-75.60%

+20.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-27.74%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-34.40%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.59%

-61.44%

+29.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-61.44%

+24.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-22.11%

+19.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.42%

-30.12%

+15.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

9.70%

-6.86%

Volatility

BBY.L vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) is 7.05%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 14.76%. This indicates that BBY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBY.LNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

14.76%

-7.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.48%

35.66%

-17.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

45.95%

-23.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

35.94%

-12.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.34%

34.66%

-7.32%

Dividends

BBY.L vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

BBY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than NEM's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBY.L
Balfour Beatty plc
1.67%1.81%2.59%3.17%2.81%1.72%1.59%2.03%1.60%1.01%0.33%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

BBY.L vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balfour Beatty plc and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B202120222023202420252026
4.97B
0
(BBY.L) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BBY.L values in GBP, NEM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BBY.L and NEM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBY.L and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer