BBY.L vs. AGI.TO
BBY.L (Balfour Beatty plc) and AGI.TO (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. BBY.L operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while AGI.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BBY.L returned 16.44%/yr vs 17.80%/yr for AGI.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BBY.L is traded in GBp, while AGI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AGI.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBY.L achieves a 19.40% return, which is significantly higher than AGI.TO's -8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BBY.L has underperformed AGI.TO with an annualized return of 16.44%, while AGI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.
BBY.L
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 19.40%
- 6M
- 19.82%
- 1Y
- 71.74%
- 3Y*
- 35.84%
- 5Y*
- 26.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.44%
AGI.TO
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -19.01%
- YTD
- -8.38%
- 6M
- -8.52%
- 1Y
- 29.96%
- 3Y*
- 39.74%
- 5Y*
- 34.19%
- 10Y*
- 17.80%
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBY.L Balfour Beatty plc | 19.40% | 60.14% | 41.45% | 1.07% | 33.46% | -1.39% | 5.28% | 7.22% | -14.87% | 11.65% |
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | -8.38% | 95.15% | 40.44% | 27.72% | 49.80% | -10.73% | 42.56% | 60.86% | -41.24% | -13.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBY.L and AGI.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | 0.02 |
The correlation between BBY.L and AGI.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (10 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BBY.L:
£4.19B
AGI.TO:
CA$20.75B
BBY.L:
£0.87
AGI.TO:
$2.52
BBY.L:
9.64
AGI.TO:
13.99
BBY.L:
0.25
AGI.TO:
0.09
BBY.L:
0.24
AGI.TO:
7.19
BBY.L:
3.67
AGI.TO:
3.22
BBY.L:
£17.72B
AGI.TO:
$2.07B
BBY.L:
£872.00M
AGI.TO:
$1.22B
BBY.L:
£509.00M
AGI.TO:
$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BBY.L
AGI.TO
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBY.L | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.14 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 0.77 | +4.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.85 | 2.24 | +21.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBY.L drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, smaller than the maximum AGI.TO drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBY.L and AGI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBY.L | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -86.96% | +32.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -40.30% | +28.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | -40.30% | +23.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.59% | -40.30% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -70.30% | +32.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -36.26% | +33.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -36.05% | +21.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 13.87% | -11.03% |
Volatility
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) is 7.05%, while Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) has a volatility of 16.82%. This indicates that BBY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBY.L | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 16.82% | -9.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.48% | 40.26% | -21.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 49.32% | -26.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 38.01% | -14.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.34% | 46.53% | -19.19% |
Dividends
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO - Dividend Comparison
BBY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than AGI.TO's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.37% | 0.26% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 1.03% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.41% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.88% |
BBY.L Balfour Beatty plc | 1.67% | 1.81% | 2.59% | 3.17% | 2.81% | 1.72% | 1.59% | 2.03% | 1.60% | 1.01% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Financials
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balfour Beatty plc and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BBY.L vs. AGI.TO - Profitability Comparison
BBY.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported a gross profit of 265.00M and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.3%.
AGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 375.05M and revenue of 586.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
BBY.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported an operating income of 105.00M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
AGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 336.79M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.
BBY.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported a net income of 162.00M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
AGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.26M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBY.L and AGI.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BBY.L and AGI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer