BBUS vs. SCHX
BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS returned 12.52%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for SCHX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
BBUS vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 8.04% return.
BBUS
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.62%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
BBUS vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.57% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.04% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS and SCHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.99 |
The correlation between BBUS and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBUS vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBUS
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBUS
SCHX
Financial Services
BBUS
SCHX
Communication Services
BBUS
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
BBUS
SCHX
Healthcare
BBUS
SCHX
Industrials
BBUS
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
BBUS
SCHX
Energy
BBUS
SCHX
Utilities
BBUS
SCHX
Real Estate
BBUS
SCHX
Basic Materials
BBUS
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBUS vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
BBUS
SCHX
BBUS vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBUS | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.57 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.97 | 11.26 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBUS vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBUS | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -34.33% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -9.02% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -19.04% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -25.41% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -3.11% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -3.96% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.05% | +0.03% |
Volatility
BBUS vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 5.00% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBUS | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.89% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 9.94% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 12.65% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 17.23% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 18.16% | +1.43% |
BBUS vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBUS vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SCHX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, BBUS and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBUS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to SCHX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.52% vs 12.44% for SCHX. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.
BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBUS and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer