PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBUS vs. JQUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBUS vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.16% return.


BBUS

1D
0.47%
1M
4.82%
YTD
11.12%
6M
10.90%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*

JQUA

1D
-0.11%
1M
7.20%
YTD
14.16%
6M
14.37%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
14.16%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%14.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and JQUA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.96

The correlation between BBUS and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBUS vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBUS
JQUA

Technology

37.1%
41.9%

Financial Services

10.8%
10.2%

Communication Services

10.8%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.2%

Healthcare

8.1%
7.2%

Industrials

7.2%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
5.3%

Energy

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

2.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.8%

Technology

BBUS
37.1%
JQUA
41.9%

Financial Services

BBUS
10.8%
JQUA
10.2%

Communication Services

BBUS
10.8%
JQUA
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BBUS
9.4%
JQUA
9.2%

Healthcare

BBUS
8.1%
JQUA
7.2%

Industrials

BBUS
7.2%
JQUA
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

BBUS
4.5%
JQUA
5.3%

Energy

BBUS
3.2%
JQUA
3.2%

Utilities

BBUS
2.6%
JQUA
2.3%

Real Estate

BBUS
1.7%
JQUA
2.1%

Basic Materials

BBUS
1.2%
JQUA
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBUS vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBUSJQUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.20

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.04

13.48

+0.56

BBUS vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBUSJQUADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.03

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.90

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.83

+0.01

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than JQUA's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and JQUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBUSJQUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-32.92%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-7.13%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-16.81%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-22.47%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.28%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-4.16%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.69%

+0.31%

Volatility

BBUS vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBUSJQUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.82%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

8.31%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

11.20%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

15.61%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

17.99%

+1.60%

BBUS vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBUS vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than JQUA's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBUS and JQUA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to JQUA (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.92% vs 13.53% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JQUA.

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.12% for JQUA.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBUS and JQUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer