BBUS vs. ILCV
BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while ILCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS returned 13.43%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for ILCV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCV.
Performance
BBUS vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 7.75% return.
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
BBUS vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 7.75% | 18.79% | 17.03% | 14.43% | -7.02% | 26.71% | -0.84% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS and ILCV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between BBUS and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBUS vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBUS
ILCV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBUS
ILCV
Financial Services
BBUS
ILCV
Communication Services
BBUS
ILCV
Consumer Cyclical
BBUS
ILCV
Healthcare
BBUS
ILCV
Industrials
BBUS
ILCV
Consumer Defensive
BBUS
ILCV
Energy
BBUS
ILCV
Utilities
BBUS
ILCV
Real Estate
BBUS
ILCV
Basic Materials
BBUS
ILCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBUS vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank
BBUS
ILCV
BBUS vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBUS | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.08 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 16.87 | -3.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBUS | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.72 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.81 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.46 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
BBUS vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and ILCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBUS | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -58.63% | +23.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -6.55% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -14.95% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -18.58% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.60% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -9.32% | +3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.58% | +0.42% |
Volatility
BBUS vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that BBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBUS | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 2.01% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 6.97% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 9.82% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 14.21% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 16.66% | +2.93% |
BBUS vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBUS vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison
BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than ILCV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBUS and ILCV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBUS has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs ILCV's -58.63%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 11.42% for ILCV. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for ILCV.
ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.
BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ILCV is Large Cap Value Equities. BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.04% for ILCV.
ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBUS and ILCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer