PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBUS vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBUS vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBUS having a 7.57% return and ILCV slightly higher at 7.60%.


BBUS

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.62%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*

ILCV

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.97%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
7.57%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.60%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%14.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and ILCV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.85

The correlation between BBUS and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBUS vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBUS
ILCV

Technology

38.1%
24.7%

Financial Services

11.2%
16.5%

Communication Services

10.0%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.0%
11.4%

Industrials

7.4%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.5%

Energy

3.0%
6.0%

Utilities

2.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.4%

Technology

BBUS
38.1%
ILCV
24.7%

Financial Services

BBUS
11.2%
ILCV
16.5%

Communication Services

BBUS
10.0%
ILCV
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BBUS
9.1%
ILCV
9.6%

Healthcare

BBUS
8.0%
ILCV
11.4%

Industrials

BBUS
7.4%
ILCV
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

BBUS
4.4%
ILCV
7.5%

Energy

BBUS
3.0%
ILCV
6.0%

Utilities

BBUS
2.6%
ILCV
3.5%

Real Estate

BBUS
1.7%
ILCV
2.1%

Basic Materials

BBUS
1.2%
ILCV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBUS vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBUSILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.93

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.97

16.12

-5.15

BBUS vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBUSILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-58.63%

+23.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-6.55%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-14.95%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-18.58%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.47%

-1.39%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-9.30%

+3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.60%

+0.48%

Volatility

BBUS vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.97%. This indicates that BBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBUSILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

2.97%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

7.21%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

10.01%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

14.21%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

16.66%

+2.93%

BBUS vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBUS vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than ILCV's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.62%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBUS and ILCV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to ILCV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.52% vs 11.80% for ILCV. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.

BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ILCV is Large Cap Value Equities. BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBUS and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer