BBUS vs. ILCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index while ILCG tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS returned 13.43%/yr vs 14.95%/yr for ILCG. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.

Performance

BBUS vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return.

BBUS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 27.47%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

ILCG

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 7.68%
• YTD: 14.48%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: 29.51%
• 3Y*: 26.55%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	10.60%	17.77%	24.89%	27.20%	-19.46%	27.13%	20.69%	16.53%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	14.48%	16.71%	32.82%	40.41%	-31.75%	24.33%	38.56%	17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and ILCG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019	0.94

The correlation between BBUS and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBUS vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBUS	ILCG
Technology	37.1%	49.8%
Financial Services	10.8%	6.0%
Communication Services	10.8%	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	10.6%
Healthcare	8.1%	5.3%
Industrials	7.2%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	1.6%
Energy	3.2%	0.5%
Utilities	2.6%	0.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.1%

Return for Risk

BBUS vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 68
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

ILCG

ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 46
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBUS	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	1.82	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	2.45	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.32	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	1.89	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.76	6.68	+7.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBUS vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBUS	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	1.82	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.68	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.59	+0.25

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and ILCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBUS	ILCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.35%	-52.98%	+17.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-15.65%	+6.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.01%	-23.10%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.46%	-35.38%	+9.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.02%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.46%	-8.22%	+2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	4.43%	-2.43%

Volatility

BBUS vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is 2.88%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that BBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBUS	ILCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	4.40%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.96%	12.81%	-3.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	16.31%	-4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	22.00%	-4.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.59%	21.53%	-1.94%

BBUS vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBUS vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than ILCG's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	0.98%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	0.40%	0.47%	0.50%	0.69%	0.75%	0.34%	0.28%	0.54%	0.81%	0.89%	0.95%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBUS and ILCG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, BBUS and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BBUS or ILCG?

ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

Which ETF is better, BBUS or ILCG?

On 5-year performance, ILCG leads with 14.95% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBUS or ILCG?

Over the 5-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBUS or ILCG?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for ILCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBUS or ILCG?

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.

What is the main difference between BBUS and ILCG?

BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.04% for ILCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.