BBTBX vs. BBGLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX) and Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX).
BBTBX is managed by Bridge Builder. It was launched on Oct 28, 2013. BBGLX is managed by Bridge Builder. It was launched on Apr 27, 2015.
Performance
BBTBX vs. BBGLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBTBX vs. BBGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBTBX Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund | -0.65% | 7.82% | 1.89% | 5.41% | -13.49% | -1.12% | 8.54% | 9.15% | 0.13% | 4.14% |
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund | -9.61% | 2.79% | 21.45% | 32.21% | -26.82% | 23.34% | 34.84% | 33.32% | 0.10% | 25.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBTBX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than BBGLX's -9.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BBTBX has underperformed BBGLX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while BBGLX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.
BBTBX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
BBGLX
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -17.04%
- 1Y
- -0.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBTBX vs. BBGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBTBX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BBGLX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BBTBX vs. BBGLX — Risk / Return Rank
BBTBX
BBGLX
BBTBX vs. BBGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX) and Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBTBX | BBGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | -0.01 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 0.14 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | -0.10 | +1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -0.29 | +4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBTBX | BBGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | -0.01 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.27 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.64 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBTBX and BBGLX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BBTBX vs. BBGLX - Dividend Comparison
BBTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, while BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBTBX Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund | 3.66% | 4.58% | 3.92% | 2.86% | 2.26% | 2.38% | 4.73% | 3.39% | 3.02% | 2.67% | 0.95% | 0.17% |
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.16% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 7.71% | 3.67% | 2.05% | 5.25% | 0.80% | 0.92% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
BBTBX vs. BBGLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBTBX drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum BBGLX drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBTBX and BBGLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBTBX | BBGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -32.31% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -22.44% | +19.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.54% | -32.31% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.54% | -32.31% | +13.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -19.82% | +17.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -6.14% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 7.98% | -6.95% |
Volatility
BBTBX vs. BBGLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX) is 1.65%, while Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that BBTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBTBX | BBGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 6.13% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 13.62% | -10.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56% | 21.76% | -17.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 19.63% | -13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 19.40% | -14.48% |