PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBTBX vs. PTUIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBTBX vs. PTUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX) and PIMCO Total Return Fund IV (PTUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBTBX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than PTUIX's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BBTBX has underperformed PTUIX with an annualized return of 1.81%, while PTUIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.02% annualized return.


BBTBX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.08%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
1.81%

PTUIX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.64%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
2.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBTBX vs. PTUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBTBX
Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund
0.14%7.82%1.89%5.41%-13.49%-1.12%8.54%9.15%0.13%4.14%
PTUIX
PIMCO Total Return Fund IV
0.48%8.16%2.19%5.90%-13.84%-1.12%7.33%9.67%-0.76%4.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BBTBX and PTUIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2013

0.93

The correlation between BBTBX and PTUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBTBX vs. PTUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBTBX
BBTBX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BBTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BBTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PTUIX
PTUIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PTUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PTUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBTBX vs. PTUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX) and PIMCO Total Return Fund IV (PTUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBTBXPTUIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.90

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.47

5.83

-0.37

BBTBX vs. PTUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the PTUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBTBX and PTUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBTBXPTUIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.07

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.39

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.58

-0.20

Drawdowns

BBTBX vs. PTUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBTBX drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, roughly equal to the maximum PTUIX drawdown of -19.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBTBX and PTUIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBTBXPTUIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-19.19%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-3.38%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.32%

-5.99%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-19.19%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

-19.19%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-1.37%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-3.54%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.09%

-0.08%

Volatility

BBTBX vs. PTUIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX) is 1.41%, while PIMCO Total Return Fund IV (PTUIX) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that BBTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBTBXPTUIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.59%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

3.21%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

4.20%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

6.06%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

5.15%

-0.21%

BBTBX vs. PTUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBTBX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PTUIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBTBX vs. PTUIX - Dividend Comparison

BBTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than PTUIX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBTBX
Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund
4.07%4.58%3.92%2.86%2.26%2.38%4.73%3.39%3.02%2.67%0.95%0.17%
PTUIX
PIMCO Total Return Fund IV
4.17%4.09%4.21%2.78%2.74%1.84%2.24%2.78%2.53%1.75%2.96%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BBTBX and PTUIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTUIX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to BBTBX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBTBX dropped -18.54% vs PTUIX's -19.19%.

PTUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBTBX and PTUIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer