BBSOX vs. FHCOX
BBSOX (BlackRock Short Obligations Fund) and FHCOX (Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, BBSOX returned 3.31%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for FHCOX. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BBSOX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FHCOX.
Performance
BBSOX vs. FHCOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBSOX having a 1.72% return and FHCOX slightly higher at 1.77%.
BBSOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.00%
FHCOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BBSOX vs. FHCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSOX BlackRock Short Obligations Fund | 1.72% | 4.74% | 5.36% | 4.36% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund | 1.77% | 4.94% | 5.34% | 4.80% | 0.76% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSOX and FHCOX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.33 |
The correlation between BBSOX and FHCOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (5 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSOX vs. FHCOX — Risk / Return Rank
BBSOX
FHCOX
BBSOX vs. FHCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBSOX | FHCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.90 | 3.84 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.77 | 14.52 | +6.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 65.78 | 71.19 | -5.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBSOX vs. FHCOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSOX drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, which is greater than FHCOX's maximum drawdown of -0.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSOX and FHCOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSOX | FHCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -0.59% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -0.30% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.30% | -0.50% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.00% | -0.59% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.10% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BBSOX vs. FHCOX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) has a higher volatility of 0.14% compared to Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) at 0.00%. This indicates that BBSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSOX | FHCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | 0.00% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.91% | 0.91% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30% | 1.34% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.27% | 1.45% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.03% | 1.39% | -0.36% |
BBSOX vs. FHCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FHCOX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBSOX vs. FHCOX - Dividend Comparison
BBSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than FHCOX's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSOX BlackRock Short Obligations Fund | 3.83% | 4.43% | 5.01% | 3.35% | 1.29% | 0.30% | 1.13% | 2.56% | 2.24% | 1.17% | 1.03% | 0.62% |
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund | 3.94% | 4.61% | 4.99% | 4.17% | 1.26% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBSOX and FHCOX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBSOX has higher volatility (0.14%) compared to FHCOX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSOX dropped -1.59% vs FHCOX's -0.59%.
FHCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 3.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBSOX and FHCOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer