PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSC vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSC vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 66.14% return.


BBSC

1D
0.90%
1M
3.83%
YTD
21.58%
6M
18.47%
1Y
41.21%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*

UGA

1D
4.14%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
66.14%
6M
62.36%
1Y
70.24%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
23.21%
10Y*
14.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSC vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
21.58%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
66.14%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%23.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and UGA is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.12

The correlation between BBSC and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSC vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSC vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBSCUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

3.47

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.20

10.69

+3.51

BBSC vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSCUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-86.59%

+55.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-20.32%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-26.68%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-38.11%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.02%

+17.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-36.69%

+25.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

6.59%

-3.68%

Volatility

BBSC vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) is 5.25%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that BBSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSCUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

8.84%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

30.92%

-17.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

34.74%

-15.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.97%

34.52%

-11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

37.24%

-14.41%

BBSC vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBSC vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.00%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSC and UGA have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to BBSC (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 23.21% vs 7.14% for BBSC. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 23.21% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

BBSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

BBSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.75% for UGA.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSC and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer