PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSC vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSC vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 8.30% return.


BBSC

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.71%
YTD
15.75%
6M
14.20%
1Y
35.98%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*

CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSC vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
15.75%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and CSB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.85

The correlation between BBSC and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBSC vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBSC
CSB

Technology

18.5%
1.2%

Financial Services

16.9%
26.5%

Healthcare

15.7%
0.4%

Industrials

14.9%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
19.0%

Real Estate

7.7%

-

Energy

6.4%
11.5%

Basic Materials

4.1%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.6%

Utilities

1.2%
22.0%

Technology

BBSC
18.5%
CSB
1.2%

Financial Services

BBSC
16.9%
CSB
26.5%

Healthcare

BBSC
15.7%
CSB
0.4%

Industrials

BBSC
14.9%
CSB
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BBSC
9.0%
CSB
19.0%

Real Estate

BBSC
7.7%
CSB

-

Energy

BBSC
6.4%
CSB
11.5%

Basic Materials

BBSC
4.1%
CSB
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

BBSC
3.2%
CSB
4.4%

Communication Services

BBSC
2.4%
CSB
3.6%

Utilities

BBSC
1.2%
CSB
22.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSC vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSC vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSCCSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.51

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

7.26

+5.10

BBSC vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBSCCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.25

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.20

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.45

+0.04

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSCCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-42.07%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-7.18%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-21.82%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-24.49%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-3.12%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.49%

-7.14%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.48%

+0.44%

Volatility

BBSC vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that BBSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSCCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

3.59%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

9.19%

+3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

14.54%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.93%

18.78%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

21.31%

+1.55%

BBSC vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBSC vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.03%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSC and CSB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBSC has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 5-year performance, BBSC leads with 6.64% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBSC has performed better with a 6.64% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.03% for BBSC.

BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.35% for CSB.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSC and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer