PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSC vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 22.80% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 11.30% return.


BBSC

1D
1.77%
1M
0.16%
6M
16.07%
YTD
22.80%
1Y
39.29%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.85%

BBUS

1D
1.46%
1M
1.67%
6M
9.38%
YTD
11.30%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$572.49K$377.85K$898.85K
$26.15M$23.57M$29.57M

BBSC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
22.80%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.30%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and BBUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.80

The correlation between BBSC and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBSC vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBSC
BBUS

Technology

18.9%
38.7%

Healthcare

16.8%
8.9%

Financial Services

15.7%
11.6%

Industrials

14.4%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
9.4%

Real Estate

7.5%
1.7%

Energy

4.5%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
9.9%

Utilities

1.5%
2.2%

Technology

BBSC
18.9%
BBUS
38.7%

Healthcare

BBSC
16.8%
BBUS
8.9%

Financial Services

BBSC
15.7%
BBUS
11.6%

Industrials

BBSC
14.4%
BBUS
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BBSC
11.6%
BBUS
9.4%

Real Estate

BBSC
7.5%
BBUS
1.7%

Energy

BBSC
4.5%
BBUS
3.0%

Basic Materials

BBSC
4.0%
BBUS
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

BBSC
2.9%
BBUS
4.4%

Communication Services

BBSC
2.4%
BBUS
9.9%

Utilities

BBSC
1.5%
BBUS
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBSC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBSCBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.46

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.57

10.36

+3.21

BBSC vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSCBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-35.35%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-9.21%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-19.01%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-25.46%

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.12%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.20%

-5.38%

-5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.18%

+0.72%

Volatility

BBSC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.82%. This indicates that BBSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSCBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.82%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

10.23%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

12.87%

+6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

17.17%

+5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

19.50%

+3.19%

BBSC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBSC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, which matches BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
0.99%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSC and BBUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBSC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to BBUS (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.56% vs 8.63% for BBSC. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for BBSC.

BBSC and BBUS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.99%.

BBSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSC and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer