BBSB vs. IBTF
BBSB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - BBSB tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index while IBTF tracks the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBSB returned 4.15%/yr vs 3.66%/yr for IBTF. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBSB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.
Performance
BBSB vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BBSB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
BBSB vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 0.55% | 5.12% | 4.00% | 2.56% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 3.81% | 4.60% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSB and IBTF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between BBSB and IBTF shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSB vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank
BBSB
IBTF
BBSB vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSB | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -15.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 6.12 | -4.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 58.19 | -54.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.07 | 264.16 | -248.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSB | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 6.96 | -4.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 0.44 | +1.92 |
Drawdowns
BBSB vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSB drawdown since its inception was -1.57%, smaller than the maximum IBTF drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSB and IBTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSB | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -10.45% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.86% | -0.04% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.96% | -0.67% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -3.32% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 0.01% | +0.20% |
Volatility
BBSB vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) has a higher volatility of 0.36% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that BBSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSB | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 0.00% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.85% | 0.18% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27% | 0.36% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 2.38% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 2.56% | -0.90% |
BBSB vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBSB vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison
BBSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than IBTF's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 3.81% | 3.69% | 4.84% | 3.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 2.08% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBSB and IBTF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBSB has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSB dropped -1.57% vs IBTF's -10.45%.
On 3-year performance, BBSB leads with 4.15% vs 3.66% for IBTF. On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BBSB has performed better with a 4.15% return vs 3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTF.
BBSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.08% for IBTF.
BBSB tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while IBTF tracks ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBSB and 0.07% for IBTF.
IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.96 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBSB and IBTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer