BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBRT.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - BBRT.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Government Bond US Index, while JPLG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBRT.L returned 0.50%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for JPLG.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBRT.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.

Performance

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BBRT.L is traded in GBP, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBRT.L achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.

BBRT.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.14%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: -0.65%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: 0.09%
• 5Y*: 0.50%
• 10Y*: —

JPLG.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 11.42%
• 1Y: 22.95%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBRT.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-0.18%	-0.87%	2.21%	-1.99%	-2.50%	-1.20%	4.45%	-3.58%
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating	10.77%	10.11%	12.09%	7.05%	0.72%	24.67%	2.57%	-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BBRT.L and JPLG.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.07

Over the past year, BBRT.L and JPLG.L have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBRT.L

BBRT.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
BBRT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BBRT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BBRT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BBRT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BBRT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

JPLG.L

JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBRT.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	2.90	-2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	3.98	-2.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.52	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	4.09	-3.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.05	15.27	-13.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBRT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBRT.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBRT.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	2.90	-2.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.95	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.69	-0.64

Drawdowns

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBRT.L drawdown since its inception was -24.57%, smaller than the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBRT.L and JPLG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBRT.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.57%	-27.53%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.22%	-5.59%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.23%	-13.65%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.20%	-13.65%	-2.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.97%	0.00%	-19.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.82%	-3.30%	-13.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	1.50%	+0.71%

Volatility

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) is 1.49%, while JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) has a volatility of 1.96%. This indicates that BBRT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBRT.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	1.96%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.49%	5.88%	-1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.10%	7.87%	-1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.83%	10.90%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.57%	13.75%	-4.18%

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBRT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBRT.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBRT.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBRT.L and JPLG.L in my portfolio?

BBRT.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBRT.L or JPLG.L?

On fees, BBRT.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBRT.L or JPLG.L?

BBRT.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JPLG.L.

What is the main difference between BBRT.L and JPLG.L?

BBRT.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while JPLG.L is Global Equities. BBRT.L tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond US Index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBRT.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.