PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBRT.L is traded in GBP, while TR3G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TR3G.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBRT.L achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than TR3G.L's 0.69% return.


BBRT.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.14%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-0.65%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
0.09%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*

TR3G.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.13%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.31%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBRT.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.18%-0.87%2.21%-1.99%-2.50%-1.20%4.45%3.80%
TR3G.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist
0.69%-1.98%5.82%-1.57%7.69%0.63%-0.33%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BBRT.L and TR3G.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.86

The correlation between BBRT.L and TR3G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBRT.L
BBRT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BBRT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBRT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBRT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BBRT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBRT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TR3G.L
TR3G.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TR3G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TR3G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TR3G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TR3G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TR3G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBRT.LTR3G.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

0.98

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

2.48

-0.42

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBRT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the TR3G.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBRT.L and TR3G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBRT.LTR3G.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.73

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.36

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.18

-0.13

Drawdowns

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBRT.L drawdown since its inception was -24.57%, which is greater than TR3G.L's maximum drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBRT.L and TR3G.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBRT.LTR3G.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.57%

-18.79%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-4.52%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.23%

-8.90%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.20%

-16.36%

+0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.97%

-7.63%

-12.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.82%

-9.79%

-7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.78%

+0.43%

Volatility

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) is 1.49%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that BBRT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TR3G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBRT.LTR3G.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.70%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

4.44%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10%

6.07%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.83%

8.07%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.57%

8.64%

+0.93%

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBRT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TR3G.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBRT.L vs. TR3G.L - Dividend Comparison

BBRT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TR3G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBRT.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TR3G.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist
3.95%4.10%4.31%4.18%1.99%0.31%1.28%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBRT.L and TR3G.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TR3G.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TR3G.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBRT.L.

BBRT.L tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond US Index, while TR3G.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBRT.L and 0.06% for TR3G.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBRT.L and TR3G.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer