BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L).

BBRT.L and PRIT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBRT.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Apr 25, 2019. PRIT.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Feb 5, 2019. Both BBRT.L and PRIT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBRT.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.91%	-0.87%	2.21%	-1.99%	-2.50%	-1.20%	4.45%	3.80%
PRIT.L Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)	0.93%	-1.06%	2.57%	-1.73%	-1.79%	-0.98%	4.03%	2.09%

Different Trading Currencies

BBRT.L is traded in GBP, while PRIT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBRT.L having a 0.91% return and PRIT.L slightly higher at 0.93%.

BBRT.L

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 2.06%
• 1Y: -0.04%
• 3Y*: 0.07%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: —

PRIT.L

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.78%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 1.98%
• 1Y: -0.11%
• 3Y*: 0.21%
• 5Y*: 0.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBRT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIT.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

BBRT.L

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

PRIT.L

Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)

Return for Risk

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBRT.L

BBRT.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
BBRT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BBRT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BBRT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BBRT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BBRT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

PRIT.L

PRIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
PRIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PRIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PRIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PRIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PRIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBRT.L	PRIT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	-0.02	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	0.03	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.00	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	0.05	+0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.10	0.08	+0.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBRT.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the PRIT.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBRT.L and PRIT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBRT.L	PRIT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	-0.02	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.07	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.11	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between BBRT.L and PRIT.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L - Dividend Comparison

BBRT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRIT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBRT.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRIT.L Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)	3.19%	3.22%	2.79%	2.34%	1.87%	1.74%	2.11%

Drawdowns

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBRT.L drawdown since its inception was -24.57%, which is greater than PRIT.L's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBRT.L and PRIT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBRT.L	PRIT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.57%	-20.06%	-4.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.56%	-7.41%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.20%	-16.09%	-0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.09%	-14.04%	-5.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.73%	-12.47%	-4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.37%	4.30%	+0.07%

Volatility

BBRT.L vs. PRIT.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L) have volatilities of 2.09% and 2.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBRT.L	PRIT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	2.08%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.52%	4.47%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	7.15%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.88%	8.93%	-0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.64%	9.40%	+0.24%