BBRE vs. ICF
BBRE (JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF) and ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - BBRE tracks the MSCI US REIT Index while ICF tracks the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBRE returned 4.42%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for ICF. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBRE charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ICF.
Performance
BBRE vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBRE having a 11.77% return and ICF slightly higher at 12.19%.
BBRE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
ICF
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
BBRE vs. ICF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 11.77% | 2.09% | 8.24% | 13.85% | -24.68% | 42.99% | -7.55% | 26.06% | -2.60% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 12.19% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | 1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBRE and ICF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.95 |
The correlation between BBRE and ICF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBRE vs. ICF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBRE
ICF
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
BBRE
ICF
Financial Services
BBRE
ICF
-
Basic Materials
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Communication Services
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Consumer Defensive
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Energy
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Healthcare
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Industrials
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Technology
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Utilities
BBRE
-
ICF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBRE vs. ICF — Risk / Return Rank
BBRE
ICF
BBRE vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBRE | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.20 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.38 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 3.92 | +1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBRE | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.16 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
BBRE vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBRE drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBRE and ICF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBRE | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -76.74% | +33.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -8.20% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -17.25% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.15% | -34.74% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -2.67% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -14.18% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.88% | -0.33% |
Volatility
BBRE vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) at 3.71%. This indicates that BBRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBRE | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 3.71% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 9.85% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 13.57% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 18.91% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 20.58% | +1.98% |
BBRE vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBRE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBRE vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
BBRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than ICF's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 2.81% | 3.24% | 3.19% | 3.68% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 3.17% | 2.19% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.48% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BBRE and ICF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBRE has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to ICF (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBRE dropped -43.61% vs ICF's -76.74%.
On 5-year performance, BBRE leads with 4.42% vs 3.01% for ICF. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBRE has performed better with a 4.42% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.48% for ICF.
BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index, while ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BBRE and 0.34% for ICF.
BBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBRE and ICF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer