BBP vs. VCLN

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BBP (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF) and VCLN (Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index, while VCLN is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. BBP is passively managed, while VCLN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBP returned 22.51%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for VCLN. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for VCLN.

Performance

BBP vs. VCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 22.12% return, which is significantly higher than VCLN's 15.10% return.

BBP

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 11.96%
• 6M: 21.78%
• YTD: 22.12%
• 1Y: 56.48%
• 3Y*: 22.51%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: 13.09%

VCLN

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: -9.46%
• 6M: 9.70%
• YTD: 15.10%
• 1Y: 50.50%
• 3Y*: 12.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBP vs. VCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	22.12%	33.15%	3.32%	17.88%	0.85%	-3.89%
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF	15.10%	55.75%	-6.69%	-17.54%	-7.87%	-5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BBP and VCLN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021	0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between BBP and VCLN has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBP vs. VCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBP	VCLN
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	36.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	29.6%
Utilities	-	33.5%

Return for Risk

BBP vs. VCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBP

BBP Risk / Return Rank: 89
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

VCLN

VCLN Risk / Return Rank: 62
VCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
VCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBP vs. VCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBP	VCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.64	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.29	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.28	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.12	2.59	+3.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.80	9.28	+9.52

BBP vs. VCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the VCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBP and VCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBP vs. VCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, roughly equal to the maximum VCLN drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and VCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBP	VCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.32%	-45.66%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-19.62%	+10.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.09%	-29.25%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.82%	-18.24%	+12.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-23.82%	+11.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	5.45%	-2.43%

Volatility

BBP vs. VCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) is 7.46%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that BBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBP	VCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.46%	9.34%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.22%	22.43%	-3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.21%	31.02%	-6.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.44%	27.74%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.36%	27.74%	-0.38%

BBP vs. VCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBP vs. VCLN - Dividend Comparison

BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	0.00%	1.29%
VCLN Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF	1.82%	2.01%	1.16%	1.14%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBP and VCLN in my portfolio?

BBP and VCLN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBP or VCLN?

VCLN has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to BBP (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBP dropped -44.32% vs VCLN's -45.66%.

Which ETF is better, BBP or VCLN?

On 3-year performance, BBP leads with 22.51% vs 12.86% for VCLN. On fees, VCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BBP has been the lower-risk option at 7.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBP or VCLN?

Over the 3-year period, BBP has performed better with a 22.51% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBP or VCLN?

VCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBP or VCLN?

VCLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

What is the main difference between BBP and VCLN?

BBP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VCLN is Sustainable. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.59% for VCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.