PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBP vs. UNHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBP vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 27.05% return.


BBP

1D
1.20%
1M
7.69%
YTD
16.04%
6M
14.38%
1Y
59.95%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
13.69%

UNHW

1D
0.63%
1M
6.62%
YTD
27.05%
6M
29.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBP vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
16.04%3.61%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
27.05%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BBP and UNHW is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.17

BBP vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBP
UNHW

Healthcare

100.0%
29.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

BBP
100.0%
UNHW
29.0%

Basic Materials

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Communication Services

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Defensive

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Energy

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Financial Services

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Industrials

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Real Estate

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Technology

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Utilities

BBP

-

UNHW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBP vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBP
BBP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

UNHW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBP vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBPUNHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.18

BBP vs. UNHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBP vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and UNHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBPUNHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.32%

-32.28%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-11.32%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

Volatility

BBP vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBPUNHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.96%

48.61%

-24.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

48.61%

-22.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.39%

48.61%

-21.22%

BBP vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBP vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.00%1.29%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
18.13%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBP and UNHW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

BBP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.99% for UNHW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBP and UNHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer