BBP vs. PBPH
BBP (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BBP tracks the LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
BBP vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 2.63% return.
BBP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 59.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBP vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF | 16.04% | 2.31% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBP and PBPH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBP vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
BBP
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBP vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBP | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBP vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBP | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.32% | -11.10% | -33.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.21% | +5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.98% | -4.36% | -7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | — | — |
Volatility
BBP vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBP | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.96% | 17.07% | +6.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.37% | 17.07% | +9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.39% | 17.07% | +10.32% |
BBP vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBP vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 1.29% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBP and PBPH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.
PBPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.
BBP tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for BBP and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer