PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBMC vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBMC vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 18.36% return, which is significantly higher than VBK's 14.98% return.


BBMC

1D
1.29%
1M
-0.65%
6M
12.42%
YTD
18.36%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.55%

VBK

1D
1.81%
1M
-3.14%
6M
10.32%
YTD
14.98%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
10.92%
ALL TIME*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.30M$1.45M$2.55M
$70.46M$72.06M$83.50M

BBMC vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
18.36%12.24%15.15%18.37%-19.77%17.64%62.09%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
14.98%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%64.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and VBK is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020

0.96

The correlation between BBMC and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBMC vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBMC
VBK

Industrials

22.8%
23.4%

Technology

15.0%
27.1%

Financial Services

12.9%
5.7%

Healthcare

12.9%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
8.9%

Real Estate

6.7%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.4%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.0%

Energy

3.5%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.6%

Utilities

2.7%
1.1%

Industrials

BBMC
22.8%
VBK
23.4%

Technology

BBMC
15.0%
VBK
27.1%

Financial Services

BBMC
12.9%
VBK
5.7%

Healthcare

BBMC
12.9%
VBK
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BBMC
11.8%
VBK
8.9%

Real Estate

BBMC
6.7%
VBK
3.7%

Basic Materials

BBMC
4.4%
VBK
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

BBMC
4.0%
VBK
2.0%

Energy

BBMC
3.5%
VBK
3.4%

Communication Services

BBMC
3.4%
VBK
3.6%

Utilities

BBMC
2.7%
VBK
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBMC vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBMC vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBMCVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.23

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

7.52

+4.39

BBMC vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBMCVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-58.68%

+28.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-11.44%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.18%

-27.54%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.11%

-38.39%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-5.22%

+4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-10.10%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

3.39%

-0.87%

Volatility

BBMC vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is 3.57%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that BBMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBMCVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

5.46%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

15.90%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

20.39%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.60%

23.67%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

22.92%

-1.97%

BBMC vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBMC vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than VBK's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.12%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BBMC and VBK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to BBMC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.74% vs 4.55% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BBMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.74% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBMC.

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.44% for VBK.

BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.05% for VBK.

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBMC and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer