PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBMC vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBMC vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBMC having a 16.66% return and VBK slightly higher at 17.41%.


BBMC

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.96%
YTD
16.66%
6M
16.84%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

VBK

1D
-1.06%
1M
4.84%
YTD
17.41%
6M
16.96%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBMC vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
16.66%12.24%15.15%18.37%-19.77%17.64%61.98%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
17.41%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%68.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and VBK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.96

The correlation between BBMC and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBMC vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBMC
VBK

Technology

21.6%
25.9%

Industrials

18.6%
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
9.6%

Financial Services

10.6%
5.6%

Healthcare

10.0%
15.3%

Real Estate

6.3%
3.9%

Basic Materials

4.9%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.4%

Energy

3.1%
4.8%

Utilities

2.6%
1.2%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.5%

Technology

BBMC
21.6%
VBK
25.9%

Industrials

BBMC
18.6%
VBK
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BBMC
11.5%
VBK
9.6%

Financial Services

BBMC
10.6%
VBK
5.6%

Healthcare

BBMC
10.0%
VBK
15.3%

Real Estate

BBMC
6.3%
VBK
3.9%

Basic Materials

BBMC
4.9%
VBK
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

BBMC
3.5%
VBK
2.4%

Energy

BBMC
3.1%
VBK
4.8%

Utilities

BBMC
2.6%
VBK
1.2%

Communication Services

BBMC
2.4%
VBK
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBMC vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBMC vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBMCVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.88

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

10.98

+2.44

BBMC vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBMCVBKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.72

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.24

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.43

+0.42

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBMCVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-58.68%

+28.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-11.44%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.18%

-27.54%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.11%

-38.39%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.06%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-10.15%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.99%

-0.52%

Volatility

BBMC vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is 4.72%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that BBMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBMCVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

5.37%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

14.62%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

19.21%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.59%

23.48%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

22.86%

-1.78%

BBMC vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBMC and VBK have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBMC vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than VBK's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.09%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BBMC and VBK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to BBMC (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.32% vs 5.68% for VBK. Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. On volatility, BBMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBMC and VBK have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard.

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBMC and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer