BBMC vs. SMMV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBMC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while SMMV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBMC returned 8.74%/yr vs 6.54%/yr for SMMV. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BBMC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.

Performance

BBMC vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 18.36% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 9.82% return.

BBMC

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -0.65%
• 6M: 12.42%
• YTD: 18.36%
• 1Y: 29.93%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.55%

SMMV

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 1.01%
• 6M: 7.53%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 1Y: 16.62%
• 3Y*: 12.54%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	$1.30M	$1.45M	$2.55M
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF	$351.26K	$334.06K	$426.33K

BBMC vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	18.36%	12.24%	15.15%	18.37%	-19.77%	17.64%	62.09%
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF	9.82%	6.42%	18.29%	5.63%	-10.00%	16.64%	23.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and SMMV is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between BBMC and SMMV has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBMC vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBMC	SMMV
Industrials	22.8%	13.6%
Technology	15.0%	13.7%
Financial Services	12.9%	9.2%
Healthcare	12.9%	18.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	5.3%
Real Estate	6.7%	12.5%
Basic Materials	4.4%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	7.6%
Energy	3.5%	5.2%
Communication Services	3.4%	5.1%
Utilities	2.7%	7.5%

Return for Risk

BBMC vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBMC

BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 78
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

SMMV

SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 69
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBMC vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBMC	SMMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.72	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.62	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.31	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	2.38	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.91	7.32	+4.59

BBMC vs. SMMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the SMMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and SMMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum SMMV drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and SMMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBMC	SMMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.11%	-38.77%	+8.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-7.02%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.18%	-13.68%	-10.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.11%	-18.00%	-12.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-0.63%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.73%	-5.03%	-3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	2.28%	+0.24%

Volatility

BBMC vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.67%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBMC	SMMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	2.67%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.62%	6.99%	+5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.77%	9.73%	+7.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.60%	13.45%	+7.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.95%	15.61%	+5.34%

BBMC vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBMC vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SMMV's 1.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.12%	1.25%	1.31%	1.36%	1.48%	0.87%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF	1.65%	1.77%	1.76%	2.30%	1.67%	1.08%	1.39%	1.64%	1.72%	1.63%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBMC and SMMV in my portfolio?

BBMC and SMMV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBMC or SMMV?

BBMC has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to SMMV (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs SMMV's -38.77%.

Which ETF is better, BBMC or SMMV?

On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.74% vs 6.54% for SMMV. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBMC or SMMV?

Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.74% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBMC or SMMV?

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBMC or SMMV?

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.12% for BBMC.

What is the main difference between BBMC and SMMV?

BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SMMV is Small Cap Blend Equities. BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.20% for SMMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.