BBMC vs. SMMD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD).

BBMC and SMMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBMC is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. It was launched on Apr 14, 2020. SMMD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2500 Index. It was launched on Jul 6, 2017. Both BBMC and SMMD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BBMC vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBMC vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	2.89%	12.24%	15.15%	18.37%	-19.77%	17.64%	61.98%
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	3.02%	11.72%	11.87%	17.71%	-18.53%	18.30%	63.63%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBMC having a 2.89% return and SMMD slightly higher at 3.02%.

BBMC

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 22.25%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: —

SMMD

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -4.80%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 4.87%
• 1Y: 24.33%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBMC vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

SMMD

iShares Russell 2500 ETF

BBMC

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

Return for Risk

BBMC vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBMC

BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 59
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

SMMD

SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 63
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBMC vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBMC	SMMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.11	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.66	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	1.77	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.94	7.41	-0.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBMC vs. SMMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the SMMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and SMMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBMC	SMMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	1.11	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.26	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.43	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and SMMD is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BBMC vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than SMMD's 1.21% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.24%	1.25%	1.31%	1.36%	1.48%	0.87%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	1.21%	1.28%	1.27%	1.44%	1.79%	1.12%	1.31%	1.50%	2.45%	0.68%

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum SMMD drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and SMMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBMC	SMMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.11%	-41.06%	+10.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.24%	-14.02%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.11%	-28.26%	-1.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.90%	-5.63%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.14%	-8.51%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	3.34%	-0.02%

Volatility

BBMC vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is 6.78%, while iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that BBMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBMC	SMMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.78%	7.23%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.75%	13.22%	-0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.57%	22.06%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.55%	20.79%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	22.46%	-1.26%