BBMC vs. RBIL
BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBMC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBMC returned 31.25% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. BBMC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
BBMC vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.
BBMC
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 31.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBMC vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 16.85% | 11.61% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.32% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBMC and RBIL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBMC vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
BBMC
RBIL
BBMC vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBMC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 2.13 | -0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 7.82 | -4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | 42.95 | -30.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBMC vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBMC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -0.52% | -29.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -0.52% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -0.50% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -0.07% | -8.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 0.10% | +2.39% |
Volatility
BBMC vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBMC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 0.36% | +5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 0.85% | +12.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 0.95% | +15.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 1.07% | +19.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 1.07% | +20.02% |
BBMC vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBMC vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.09% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 0.87% | 0.69% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBMC and RBIL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBMC has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs RBIL's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, BBMC leads with 31.25% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.09% for BBMC.
BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBMC and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer