PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBMC vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBMC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


BBMC

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.96%
YTD
16.66%
6M
16.84%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBMC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
16.66%12.24%15.15%18.37%-19.77%17.64%61.98%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%38.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and BBUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.86

The correlation between BBMC and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBMC vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBMC
BBUS

Technology

21.6%
37.1%

Industrials

18.6%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
9.4%

Financial Services

10.6%
10.8%

Healthcare

10.0%
8.1%

Real Estate

6.3%
1.7%

Basic Materials

4.9%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.5%

Energy

3.1%
3.2%

Utilities

2.6%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.8%

Technology

BBMC
21.6%
BBUS
37.1%

Industrials

BBMC
18.6%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BBMC
11.5%
BBUS
9.4%

Financial Services

BBMC
10.6%
BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

BBMC
10.0%
BBUS
8.1%

Real Estate

BBMC
6.3%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

BBMC
4.9%
BBUS
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

BBMC
3.5%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

BBMC
3.1%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

BBMC
2.6%
BBUS
2.6%

Communication Services

BBMC
2.4%
BBUS
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBMC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBMC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBMCBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.00

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

13.76

-0.34

BBMC vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBMCBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.33

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.79

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.84

+0.01

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBMCBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-35.35%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-9.21%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.18%

-19.01%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.11%

-25.46%

-4.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.74%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-5.46%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.00%

+0.47%

Volatility

BBMC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBMCBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

2.88%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

8.96%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

11.87%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.59%

17.03%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

19.59%

+1.49%

BBMC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBMC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.09%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%0.00%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBMC and BBUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBMC has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 8.32% for BBMC. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBMC.

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBMC and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer