BBMC vs. BBUS
BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBMC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBMC returned 8.32%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBMC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
BBMC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.
BBMC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
BBMC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 16.66% | 12.24% | 15.15% | 18.37% | -19.77% | 17.64% | 61.98% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 38.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBMC and BBUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BBMC and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBMC vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBMC
BBUS
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
BBMC
BBUS
Industrials
BBMC
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
BBMC
BBUS
Financial Services
BBMC
BBUS
Healthcare
BBMC
BBUS
Real Estate
BBMC
BBUS
Basic Materials
BBMC
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
BBMC
BBUS
Energy
BBMC
BBUS
Utilities
BBMC
BBUS
Communication Services
BBMC
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBMC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
BBMC
BBUS
BBMC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBMC | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.00 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.41 | 13.76 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBMC | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 2.33 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.79 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.84 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
BBMC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBMC | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -35.35% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -9.21% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.18% | -19.01% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.11% | -25.46% | -4.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.74% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -5.46% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.00% | +0.47% |
Volatility
BBMC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBMC | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 2.88% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 8.96% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 11.87% | +4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 17.03% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 19.59% | +1.49% |
BBMC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBMC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.09% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 0.87% | 0.69% | 0.00% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBMC and BBUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBMC has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 8.32% for BBMC. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBMC.
BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.
BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBMC and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer