BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L
BBM3.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - BBM3.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index, while JPLG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBM3.L returned 4.56%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for JPLG.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBM3.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.
Performance
BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BBM3.L is traded in GBP, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBM3.L achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.
BBM3.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- —
JPLG.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 22.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBM3.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.63% | -2.96% | 7.04% | -0.79% | 13.68% | 4.38% |
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.77% | 10.11% | 12.09% | 7.05% | 0.72% | 22.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBM3.L and JPLG.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BBM3.L
JPLG.L
BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBM3.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.52 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 4.09 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 15.27 | -12.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBM3.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 2.90 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.95 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.69 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBM3.L drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBM3.L and JPLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBM3.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -27.53% | +12.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.52% | -5.59% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -13.65% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.27% | -13.65% | -1.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | 0.00% | -5.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -3.30% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.50% | +0.31% |
Volatility
BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) have volatilities of 1.89% and 1.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBM3.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 1.96% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 5.88% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.47% | 7.87% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 10.90% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 13.75% | -5.37% |
BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBM3.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBM3.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBM3.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBM3.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBM3.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBM3.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JPLG.L.
BBM3.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while JPLG.L is Global Equities. BBM3.L tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBM3.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.
Find the right allocation for BBM3.L and JPLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer