BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L).
BBM3.L and IBTA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBM3.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Feb 17, 2021. IBTA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Apr 13, 2017. Both BBM3.L and IBTA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBM3.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.60% | -2.96% | 7.04% | -0.79% | 13.68% | 4.38% |
IBTA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.00% | -2.20% | 5.93% | -1.06% | 7.69% | 3.85% |
Different Trading Currencies
BBM3.L is traded in GBP, while IBTA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBM3.L achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than IBTA.L's 2.00% return.
BBM3.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTA.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 1.34%
- 3Y*
- 1.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BBM3.L and IBTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank
BBM3.L
IBTA.L
BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBM3.L | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 0.19 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.39 | 0.32 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.04 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 0.19 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | 0.36 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBM3.L | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 0.19 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.33 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.15 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBM3.L and IBTA.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBM3.L nor IBTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBM3.L drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum IBTA.L drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBM3.L and IBTA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBM3.L | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -5.80% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.28% | -0.74% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.27% | -5.70% | -9.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.75% | -0.49% | -4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -0.98% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 0.23% | +3.13% |
Volatility
BBM3.L vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) is 2.04%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that BBM3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBM3.L | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 2.59% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.34% | 4.82% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.90% | 7.12% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 8.25% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 8.55% | -0.13% |