BBM3.L vs. FLOT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT).

BBM3.L and FLOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBM3.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Feb 17, 2021. FLOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Jun 14, 2011. Both BBM3.L and FLOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BBM3.L vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBM3.L vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BBM3.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	2.60%	-2.96%	7.04%	-0.79%	13.68%	4.38%
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF	2.76%	-2.56%	8.39%	1.11%	13.32%	4.66%

Different Trading Currencies

BBM3.L is traded in GBP, while FLOT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOT values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBM3.L having a 2.60% return and FLOT slightly higher at 2.61%.

BBM3.L

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 1.64%
• 3Y*: 2.44%
• 5Y*: 4.25%
• 10Y*: —

FLOT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 2.08%
• 3Y*: 3.43%
• 5Y*: 4.94%
• 10Y*: 3.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBM3.L vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBM3.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

FLOT

iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF

BBM3.L

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Return for Risk

BBM3.L vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBM3.L

BBM3.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
BBM3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BBM3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BBM3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BBM3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FLOT

FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBM3.L vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBM3.L	FLOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	0.29	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	0.45	-0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.05	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.27	0.40	-0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.50	0.79	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBM3.L vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is comparable to the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBM3.L and FLOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBM3.L	FLOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24	0.29	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.58	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.39	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between BBM3.L and FLOT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BBM3.L vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

BBM3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBM3.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF	4.72%	4.84%	5.82%	5.66%	2.06%	0.43%	1.25%	2.78%	2.41%	1.46%	0.97%	0.53%

Drawdowns

BBM3.L vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBM3.L drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FLOT drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBM3.L and FLOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBM3.L	FLOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.27%	-13.54%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.28%	-1.57%	-4.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.27%	-2.36%	-12.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-13.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.75%	-0.06%	-4.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-0.21%	-6.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	0.20%	+3.16%

Volatility

BBM3.L vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) is 2.04%, while iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that BBM3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBM3.L	FLOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	2.30%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.34%	4.74%	-0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.90%	7.29%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.42%	8.63%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.42%	10.00%	-1.58%