BBLU vs. SPMO
BBLU (Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBLU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. BBLU is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBLU returned 23.09%/yr vs 43.04%/yr for SPMO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBLU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
BBLU vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBLU achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
BBLU
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 23.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
BBLU vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF | 10.22% | 18.40% | 27.47% | 31.11% | 6.20% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | 7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBLU and SPMO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between BBLU and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBLU vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBLU
SPMO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BBLU
SPMO
Financial Services
BBLU
SPMO
Communication Services
BBLU
SPMO
Healthcare
BBLU
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
BBLU
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
BBLU
SPMO
Energy
BBLU
SPMO
Industrials
BBLU
SPMO
Basic Materials
BBLU
-
SPMO
Real Estate
BBLU
-
SPMO
Utilities
BBLU
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBLU vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
BBLU
SPMO
BBLU vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBLU | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 2.62 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.72 | 3.54 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 3.64 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 14.17 | +2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBLU | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.62 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.81 | 1.01 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
BBLU vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBLU drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLU and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBLU | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -30.95% | +13.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -12.70% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.20% | -20.13% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | 0.00% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -4.60% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 3.26% | -1.45% |
Volatility
BBLU vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) is 2.82%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that BBLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBLU | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 7.35% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 14.39% | -6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 17.64% | -6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 19.30% | -4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 20.31% | -5.78% |
BBLU vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBLU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBLU vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
BBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF | 1.14% | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.68% | 32.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBLU and SPMO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to BBLU (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLU dropped -17.20% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 43.04% vs 23.09% for BBLU. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, BBLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 43.04% return vs 23.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BBLU.
BBLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
BBLU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBLU and 0.13% for SPMO.
BBLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBLU and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer