BBLU vs. QARP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BBLU (Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BBLU is actively managed, while QARP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBLU returned 20.80%/yr vs 17.33%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBLU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.

Performance

BBLU vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLU achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.

BBLU

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: 9.88%
• YTD: 10.22%
• 1Y: 22.53%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QARP

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 9.34%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 1Y: 25.00%
• 3Y*: 17.33%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLU vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	10.22%	18.40%	27.47%	31.11%	6.39%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	12.78%	13.99%	18.94%	23.03%	8.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLU and QARP is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2022	0.86

The correlation between BBLU and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBLU vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBLU	QARP
Technology	27.7%	23.5%
Financial Services	16.4%	12.1%
Healthcare	14.5%	13.9%
Communication Services	14.0%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	10.0%	9.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	9.6%
Energy	4.9%	5.8%
Industrials	2.6%	8.5%
Basic Materials	-	2.3%
Real Estate	-	1.0%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

BBLU vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLU

BBLU Risk / Return Rank: 77
BBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 77

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 87
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLU vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBLU	QARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.38	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.34	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.43	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	3.46	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.36	15.38	-4.02

BBLU vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLU and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBLU vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLU drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLU and QARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBLU	QARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-35.44%	+18.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-7.26%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.20%	-15.65%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	0.00%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-4.39%	+2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.63%	+0.36%

Volatility

BBLU vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that BBLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBLU	QARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.76%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.48%	8.22%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.41%	10.58%	+0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	15.54%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.45%	19.55%	-5.10%

BBLU vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBLU vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

BBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	1.14%	1.25%	1.39%	1.68%	32.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.02%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBLU and QARP in my portfolio?

BBLU and QARP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBLU or QARP?

BBLU has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLU dropped -17.20% vs QARP's -35.44%.

Which ETF is better, BBLU or QARP?

On 3-year performance, BBLU leads with 20.80% vs 17.33% for QARP. On fees, BBLU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBLU or QARP?

Over the 3-year period, BBLU has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 17.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBLU or QARP?

BBLU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBLU or QARP?

BBLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.

What is the main difference between BBLU and QARP?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBLU and 0.19% for QARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.