BBLU vs. AAVM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BBLU (Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF) and AAVM (Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBLU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while AAVM is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBLU returned 20.88%/yr vs 18.06%/yr for AAVM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBLU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AAVM.

Performance

BBLU vs. AAVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLU achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than AAVM's 13.54% return.

BBLU

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 21.87%
• 3Y*: 20.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAVM

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: 13.54%
• 6M: 12.26%
• 1Y: 28.38%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLU vs. AAVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	6.55%	18.40%	27.47%	31.11%	6.39%
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	13.54%	18.54%	12.07%	-0.74%	-4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLU and AAVM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2022	0.59

The correlation between BBLU and AAVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBLU vs. AAVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBLU	AAVM
Technology	33.7%	13.6%
Financial Services	14.5%	1.3%
Communication Services	13.6%	5.8%
Healthcare	12.6%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	4.7%
Energy	5.5%	12.6%
Industrials	2.1%	25.5%
Basic Materials	-	12.2%
Real Estate	-	1.3%
Utilities	-	3.8%

Return for Risk

BBLU vs. AAVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLU

BBLU Risk / Return Rank: 67
BBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

AAVM

AAVM Risk / Return Rank: 62
AAVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AAVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
AAVM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
AAVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
AAVM Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLU vs. AAVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBLU	AAVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.78	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.52	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.33	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.63	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.41	10.68	+0.73

BBLU vs. AAVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the AAVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLU and AAVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBLU vs. AAVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLU drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum AAVM drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLU and AAVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBLU	AAVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-34.71%	+17.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-10.85%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.20%	-20.23%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.13%	-3.73%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-13.24%	+11.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.66%	-0.74%

Volatility

BBLU vs. AAVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) is 3.61%, while Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that BBLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBLU	AAVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	5.92%	-2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	13.77%	-5.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.34%	16.05%	-4.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.52%	15.80%	-1.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.52%	14.96%	-0.44%

BBLU vs. AAVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AAVM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBLU vs. AAVM - Dividend Comparison

BBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than AAVM's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	1.81%	2.05%	2.54%	4.13%	2.24%	0.82%	0.00%	1.76%	0.93%	0.81%
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	1.18%	1.25%	1.39%	1.68%	32.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBLU and AAVM in my portfolio?

BBLU and AAVM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBLU or AAVM?

AAVM has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to BBLU (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLU dropped -17.20% vs AAVM's -34.71%.

Which ETF is better, BBLU or AAVM?

On 3-year performance, BBLU leads with 20.88% vs 18.06% for AAVM. On fees, BBLU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBLU or AAVM?

Over the 3-year period, BBLU has performed better with a 20.88% return vs 18.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBLU or AAVM?

BBLU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AAVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBLU or AAVM?

AAVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.18% for BBLU.

What is the main difference between BBLU and AAVM?

BBLU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AAVM is Multi-factor. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBLU and 0.45% for AAVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.