PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLGW vs. TRGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBLGW vs. TRGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bone Biologics Corp Warrants (BBLGW) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLGW achieves a -9.68% return, which is significantly lower than TRGP's 44.57% return.


BBLGW

1D
-22.57%
1M
-18.65%
YTD
-9.68%
6M
-35.48%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
158.55%
5Y*
10Y*

TRGP

1D
-1.23%
1M
5.85%
YTD
44.57%
6M
47.58%
1Y
64.58%
3Y*
58.36%
5Y*
44.63%
10Y*
24.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLGW vs. TRGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BBLGW
Bone Biologics Corp Warrants
-9.68%-61.25%920.41%638.23%-97.47%-41.18%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
44.57%5.65%110.12%21.01%43.71%-3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLGW and TRGP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2021

0.01

Fundamentals

EPS

BBLGW:

-$2.15

TRGP:

$13.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBLGW:

$0.00

TRGP:

$16.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBLGW:

$0.00

TRGP:

$3.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

BBLGW:

-$2.90M

TRGP:

$4.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLGW vs. TRGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLGW
BBLGW Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BBLGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLGW Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLGW Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

TRGP
TRGP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TRGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRGP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TRGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRGP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLGW vs. TRGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bone Biologics Corp Warrants (BBLGW) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBLGWTRGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

3.98

-3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

13.01

-12.88

BBLGW vs. TRGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLGW Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the TRGP Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLGW and TRGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBLGWTRGPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

2.37

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.47

-0.54

Drawdowns

BBLGW vs. TRGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLGW drawdown since its inception was -98.80%, roughly equal to the maximum TRGP drawdown of -95.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLGW and TRGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLGWTRGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.80%

-95.21%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.81%

-16.30%

-47.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.92%

-31.61%

-65.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.26%

-4.57%

-80.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.88%

-33.60%

-37.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.30%

4.98%

+24.32%

Volatility

BBLGW vs. TRGP - Volatility Comparison

Bone Biologics Corp Warrants (BBLGW) has a higher volatility of 49.34% compared to Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) at 8.13%. This indicates that BBLGW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLGWTRGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.34%

8.13%

+41.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.50%

18.59%

+95.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

126.95%

27.49%

+99.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

251.48%

31.96%

+219.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

251.48%

47.66%

+203.82%

Dividends

BBLGW vs. TRGP - Dividend Comparison

BBLGW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLGW
Bone Biologics Corp Warrants
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
1.61%2.03%1.54%2.13%1.90%0.77%4.59%8.92%10.11%7.52%6.49%12.53%

Financials

BBLGW vs. TRGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bone Biologics Corp Warrants and Targa Resources Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B202220232024202520260
4.09B
(BBLGW) Total Revenue
(TRGP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BBLGW and TRGP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBLGW has higher volatility (49.34%) compared to TRGP (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLGW dropped -98.80% vs TRGP's -95.21%.

TRGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLGW and TRGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer