BBLGW vs. CALM
BBLGW (Bone Biologics Corp Warrants) and CALM (Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. BBLGW operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while CALM operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, BBLGW returned 69.60%/yr vs 31.12%/yr for CALM. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BBLGW vs. CALM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBLGW achieves a -35.48% return, which is significantly lower than CALM's 11.79% return.
BBLGW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -31.03%
- 6M
- -36.02%
- YTD
- -35.48%
- 1Y
- -33.33%
- 3Y*
- 69.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -17.77%
CALM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- -14.37%
- 3Y*
- 31.12%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.53K | $5.02K | $5.01K | |
| $107.67M | $90.60M | $71.32M |
BBLGW vs. CALM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLGW Bone Biologics Corp Warrants | -35.48% | -61.25% | 920.41% | 638.23% | -97.47% | -17.84% |
CALM Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. | 11.79% | -15.61% | 87.00% | 14.48% | 51.87% | 6.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBLGW and CALM is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2021 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
BBLGW:
$1.79M
CALM:
$4.12B
BBLGW:
-$1.80
CALM:
$6.63
BBLGW:
3.84
CALM:
1.57
BBLGW:
$0.00
CALM:
$2.91B
BBLGW:
$0.00
CALM:
$672.05M
BBLGW:
-$2.90M
CALM:
$515.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBLGW vs. CALM — Risk / Return Rank
BBLGW
CALM
BBLGW vs. CALM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bone Biologics Corp Warrants (BBLGW) and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBLGW | CALM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.93 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.46 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -0.66 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBLGW vs. CALM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBLGW drawdown since its inception was -98.80%, which is greater than CALM's maximum drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLGW and CALM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBLGW | CALM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.80% | -74.08% | -24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.75% | -37.00% | -40.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.92% | -37.00% | -59.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.47% | -22.64% | -66.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.30% | -30.29% | -41.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.28% | 25.62% | +12.66% |
Volatility
BBLGW vs. CALM - Volatility Comparison
Bone Biologics Corp Warrants (BBLGW) has a higher volatility of 64.51% compared to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) at 13.24%. This indicates that BBLGW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBLGW | CALM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 64.51% | 13.24% | +51.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 129.60% | 22.88% | +106.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.64% | 30.03% | +109.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 249.50% | 33.05% | +216.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 249.50% | 31.34% | +218.16% |
Dividends
BBLGW vs. CALM - Dividend Comparison
BBLGW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLGW Bone Biologics Corp Warrants | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CALM Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. | 5.47% | 10.90% | 2.82% | 7.51% | 3.17% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 2.70% | 4.10% |
Financials
BBLGW vs. CALM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bone Biologics Corp Warrants and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BBLGW and CALM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBLGW has higher volatility (64.51%) compared to CALM (13.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLGW dropped -98.80% vs CALM's -74.08%.
BBLGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBLGW and CALM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer