BBLGW vs. FMCC
BBLGW (Bone Biologics Corp Warrants) and FMCC (Freddie Mac) are both stocks. BBLGW operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while FMCC operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, BBLGW returned 69.08%/yr vs 138.59%/yr for FMCC. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BBLGW vs. FMCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBLGW achieves a -6.45% return, which is significantly higher than FMCC's -42.11% return.
BBLGW
- 1D
- 16.47%
- 1M
- -11.80%
- YTD
- -6.45%
- 6M
- -34.09%
- 1Y
- -3.33%
- 3Y*
- 69.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMCC
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -8.42%
- YTD
- -42.11%
- 6M
- -43.67%
- 1Y
- -28.15%
- 3Y*
- 138.59%
- 5Y*
- 33.01%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
BBLGW vs. FMCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLGW Bone Biologics Corp Warrants | -6.45% | -61.25% | 920.41% | 638.23% | -97.47% | -17.84% |
FMCC Freddie Mac | -42.11% | 210.52% | 284.18% | 140.59% | -57.43% | 16.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBLGW and FMCC is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2021 | -0.01 |
The correlation between BBLGW and FMCC shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BBLGW:
-$2.15
FMCC:
$4.74
BBLGW:
$0.00
FMCC:
$100.04B
BBLGW:
$0.00
FMCC:
$100.04B
BBLGW:
-$2.90M
FMCC:
$92.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBLGW vs. FMCC — Risk / Return Rank
BBLGW
FMCC
BBLGW vs. FMCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bone Biologics Corp Warrants (BBLGW) and Freddie Mac (FMCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBLGW | FMCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.01 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | -0.40 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | -0.72 | +0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBLGW vs. FMCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBLGW drawdown since its inception was -98.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FMCC drawdown of -99.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLGW and FMCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBLGW | FMCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.80% | -99.81% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.62% | -71.31% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.92% | -71.31% | -25.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -91.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.74% | -94.11% | +9.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.94% | -68.89% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.71% | 39.35% | -7.64% |
Volatility
BBLGW vs. FMCC - Volatility Comparison
Bone Biologics Corp Warrants (BBLGW) has a higher volatility of 44.84% compared to Freddie Mac (FMCC) at 14.83%. This indicates that BBLGW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBLGW | FMCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.84% | 14.83% | +30.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 118.61% | 65.51% | +53.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.13% | 92.96% | +37.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 251.31% | 86.71% | +164.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 251.31% | 78.78% | +172.53% |
Dividends
BBLGW vs. FMCC - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBLGW nor FMCC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BBLGW vs. FMCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bone Biologics Corp Warrants and Freddie Mac. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BBLGW and FMCC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBLGW has higher volatility (44.84%) compared to FMCC (14.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLGW dropped -98.80% vs FMCC's -99.81%.
BBLGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBLGW and FMCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer