PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLB vs. GGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBLB vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLB achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 3.08% return.


BBLB

1D
0.72%
1M
-2.86%
6M
-2.32%
YTD
-2.53%
1Y
-1.51%
3Y*
-0.80%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.81%

GGOV

1D
0.46%
1M
0.36%
6M
3.80%
YTD
3.08%
1Y
0.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.45K$41.67K$60.66K
$51.29M$62.99M$79.71M

BBLB vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBLB and GGOV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.62

The correlation between BBLB and GGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLB vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBLB
BBLB Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BBLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLB Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GGOV
GGOV Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBLB vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBLBGGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.01

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

0.05

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

0.11

-0.53

BBLB vs. GGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLB Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the GGOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLB and GGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBLB vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLB drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLB and GGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLBGGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-4.69%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-4.69%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.92%

-0.75%

-10.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-1.53%

-7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

2.15%

+1.43%

Volatility

BBLB vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) at 0.91%. This indicates that BBLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLBGGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

0.91%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

3.60%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

5.23%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

5.09%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.62%

5.09%

+8.53%

BBLB vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBLB vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison

BBLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBLB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF
4.99%5.03%5.34%2.82%
GGOV
iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBLB and GGOV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBLB has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to GGOV (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLB dropped -21.06% vs GGOV's -4.69%.

On 1-year performance, GGOV leads with 0.23% vs -1.51% for BBLB. On fees, BBLB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, GGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GGOV has performed better with a 0.23% return vs -1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBLB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.

BBLB has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

BBLB is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBLB and 0.39% for GGOV.

GGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLB and GGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer