PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLB vs. SPTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBLB vs. SPTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLB achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than SPTL's -0.38% return.


BBLB

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.77%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-1.96%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
10Y*

SPTL

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
-0.70%
5Y*
-5.32%
10Y*
-1.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLB vs. SPTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBLB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF
-0.36%4.26%-7.84%-2.91%
SPTL
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF
-0.38%5.28%-6.23%-2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLB and SPTL is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2023

1.00

The correlation between BBLB and SPTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLB vs. SPTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLB
BBLB Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BBLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLB Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLB Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTL
SPTL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SPTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLB vs. SPTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBLBSPTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.82

0.90

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.10

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.74

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.70

1.94

-0.24

BBLB vs. SPTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the SPTL Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLB and SPTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBLBSPTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.24

-0.41

Drawdowns

BBLB vs. SPTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLB drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum SPTL drawdown of -46.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLB and SPTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLBSPTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-46.20%

+25.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-7.04%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-17.55%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-36.87%

+27.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-14.24%

+5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.69%

+0.31%

Volatility

BBLB vs. SPTL - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) at 2.63%. This indicates that BBLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLBSPTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.63%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

5.97%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.80%

8.92%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

14.63%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

13.95%

-0.12%

BBLB vs. SPTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTL's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBLB vs. SPTL - Dividend Comparison

BBLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than SPTL's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF
5.00%5.03%5.34%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTL
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF
4.21%4.12%4.03%3.24%2.75%1.68%1.71%2.45%2.69%2.53%2.56%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BBLB and SPTL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBLB has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to SPTL (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLB dropped -21.06% vs SPTL's -46.20%.

On 3-year performance, SPTL leads with -0.70% vs -1.70% for BBLB. On fees, SPTL is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTL has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPTL has performed better with a -0.70% return vs -1.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTL is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for BBLB.

BBLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.21% for SPTL.

BBLB tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while SPTL tracks Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBLB and 0.03% for SPTL.

SPTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLB and SPTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer