BBIB vs. TLTX
BBIB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. BBIB is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. Over the past year, BBIB returned 3.01% vs 3.72% for TLTX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBIB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
BBIB vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -1.59% return.
BBIB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBIB vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF | -0.28% | 3.57% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -1.59% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBIB and TLTX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between BBIB and TLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBIB vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
BBIB
TLTX
BBIB vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBIB | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.59 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 1.32 | +1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBIB vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, roughly equal to the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBIB | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -6.35% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -6.35% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -5.23% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -2.38% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 2.83% | -1.71% |
Volatility
BBIB vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is 1.12%, while Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that BBIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBIB | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 2.87% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 6.92% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 9.24% | -5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 9.24% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 9.24% | -4.53% |
BBIB vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBIB vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than TLTX's 17.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF | 3.93% | 3.95% | 3.76% | 2.69% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 17.73% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBIB and TLTX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLTX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to BBIB (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs TLTX's -6.35%.
On 1-year performance, TLTX leads with 3.72% vs 3.01% for BBIB. On fees, BBIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TLTX has performed better with a 3.72% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.73%, compared with 3.93% for BBIB.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.29% for TLTX.
BBIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBIB and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer