PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIB vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIB vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -1.59% return.


BBIB

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.28%
6M
-0.29%
YTD
-0.28%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
10Y*

TLTX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-3.45%
6M
-2.30%
YTD
-1.59%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIB vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and TLTX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.51

The correlation between BBIB and TLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIB vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB
BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTX
TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBIBTLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.08

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

0.59

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

1.32

+1.37

BBIB vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the TLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and TLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBIB vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, roughly equal to the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBIBTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-6.35%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-6.35%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-5.23%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-2.38%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

2.83%

-1.71%

Volatility

BBIB vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is 1.12%, while Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that BBIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBIBTLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

2.87%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

6.92%

-4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

9.24%

-5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

9.24%

-4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

9.24%

-4.53%

BBIB vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBIB vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than TLTX's 17.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBIB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF
3.93%3.95%3.76%2.69%
TLTX
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF
17.73%7.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIB and TLTX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to BBIB (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs TLTX's -6.35%.

On 1-year performance, TLTX leads with 3.72% vs 3.01% for BBIB. On fees, BBIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TLTX has performed better with a 3.72% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.73%, compared with 3.93% for BBIB.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.29% for TLTX.

BBIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIB and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer