PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIB vs. HELO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BBIB vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBIB vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBIB
Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF
0.04%7.44%1.28%4.97%
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
-3.69%7.82%18.05%6.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's -3.69% return.


BBIB

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
0.04%
6M
1.11%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HELO

1D
0.92%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-3.69%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BBIB vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BBIB vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB
BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBIBHELODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

0.91

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.36

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.39

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

5.65

-0.01

BBIB vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and HELO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBIBHELODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

0.91

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.38

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and HELO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BBIB vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than HELO's 0.66% yield.


Drawdowns

BBIB vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and HELO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBIBHELODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-10.89%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-5.76%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-4.89%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-1.21%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.41%

-0.63%

Volatility

BBIB vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is 1.36%, while JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that BBIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBIBHELODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

2.66%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

5.38%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

8.58%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

8.13%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

8.13%

-3.31%