BBIB vs. HELO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BBIB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBIB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while HELO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBIB is passively managed, while HELO is actively managed. Over the past year, BBIB returned 3.69% vs 11.65% for HELO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBIB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.

Performance

BBIB vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than HELO's 2.52% return.

BBIB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 3.69%
• 3Y*: 3.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HELO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 6M: 3.21%
• 1Y: 11.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIB vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	-0.24%	7.44%	1.28%	4.97%
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.52%	7.82%	18.05%	6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and HELO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.09

BBIB vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBIB	HELO
Communication Services	99.8%	10.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.5%
Energy	-	3.3%
Financial Services	-	10.0%
Healthcare	-	8.2%
Industrials	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.8%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

BBIB vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB

BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 28
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 27

HELO

HELO Risk / Return Rank: 53
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBIB	HELO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.89	-0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	2.65	-1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.38	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	2.05	-0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.78	9.10	-5.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBIB vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBIB	HELO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	1.89	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	1.65	-0.99

Drawdowns

BBIB vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and HELO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBIB	HELO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.36%	-10.89%	+4.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-5.76%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-0.07%	-1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.68%	-1.18%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.30%	-0.37%

Volatility

BBIB vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) at 0.66%. This indicates that BBIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBIB	HELO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	0.66%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.39%	5.00%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.41%	6.20%	-2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.75%	7.96%	-3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.75%	7.96%	-3.21%

BBIB vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBIB vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than HELO's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	3.91%	3.95%	3.76%	2.69%
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.62%	0.67%	0.60%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBIB and HELO in my portfolio?

BBIB and HELO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBIB or HELO?

BBIB has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to HELO (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs HELO's -10.89%.

Which ETF is better, BBIB or HELO?

On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 11.65% vs 3.69% for BBIB. On fees, BBIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, HELO has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBIB or HELO?

Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 11.65% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBIB or HELO?

BBIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBIB or HELO?

BBIB has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.62% for HELO.

What is the main difference between BBIB and HELO?

BBIB is categorized as Government Bonds, while HELO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.50% for HELO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HELO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.