BBHM vs. TMFX
BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHM tracks the Actively Managed while TMFX tracks the Motley Fool Next Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TMFX.
Performance
BBHM vs. TMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than TMFX's 4.09% return.
BBHM
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHM vs. TMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 1.78% | 2.74% |
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 4.09% | 5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHM and TMFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHM vs. TMFX — Risk / Return Rank
BBHM
TMFX
BBHM vs. TMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHM | TMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.12 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
BBHM vs. TMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum TMFX drawdown of -34.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and TMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHM | TMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -34.30% | +24.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -1.78% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -14.38% | +11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility
BBHM vs. TMFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHM | TMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 16.86% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 23.39% | -5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 23.39% | -5.93% |
BBHM vs. TMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHM vs. TMFX - Dividend Comparison
BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHM and TMFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMFX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMFX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.
TMFX has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.
BBHM tracks Actively Managed, while TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.50% for TMFX.
Find the right allocation for BBHM and TMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer