BBHM vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHM tracks the Actively Managed while QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Both are passively managed. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

BBHM vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BBHM

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.16%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 4.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	$677.76K	$827.89K	$1.51M
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BBHM vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	3.97%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

BBHM vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

BBHM vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBHM	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	0.00%	-9.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	0.00%	-2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	0.00%	-2.83%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBHM	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.63%	0.00%	+17.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.63%	0.00%	+17.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	0.00%	+17.63%

BBHM vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBHM vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBHM nor QQQN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BBHM or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBHM or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBHM or QQQN?

BBHM and QQQN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BBHM and QQQN?

BBHM tracks Actively Managed, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.18% for QQQN.