BBHM vs. IVOG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHM tracks the Actively Managed while IVOG tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOG.

Performance

BBHM vs. IVOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly lower than IVOG's 15.87% return.

BBHM

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.16%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 4.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

IVOG

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -2.89%
• 6M: 11.25%
• YTD: 15.87%
• 1Y: 22.81%
• 3Y*: 13.84%
• 5Y*: 7.47%
• 10Y*: 10.91%
• ALL TIME*: 12.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	$677.76K	$827.89K	$1.51M
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	$2.19M	$2.83M	$3.26M

BBHM vs. IVOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	4.62%	0.98%
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	15.87%	2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHM and IVOG is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

BBHM vs. IVOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IVOG

IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 55
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBHM vs. IVOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBHM	IVOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.80	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.98	—

Drawdowns

BBHM vs. IVOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum IVOG drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and IVOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBHM	IVOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-39.32%	+29.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-4.80%	+2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	-5.84%	+3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBHM	IVOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.63%	17.93%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.63%	20.70%	-3.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	20.61%	-2.98%

BBHM vs. IVOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOG's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBHM vs. IVOG - Dividend Comparison

BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	0.56%	0.64%	0.79%	1.15%	1.05%	0.47%	0.74%	1.17%	1.01%	0.93%	1.11%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBHM and IVOG in my portfolio?

BBHM and IVOG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBHM or IVOG?

On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBHM or IVOG?

IVOG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBHM or IVOG?

IVOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between BBHM and IVOG?

BBHM tracks Actively Managed, while IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.10% for IVOG.