BBHM vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBHM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

BBHM vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.74% return.

BBHM

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -0.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 6M: 24.40%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 29.18%
• 5Y*: 20.73%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHM vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	1.78%	2.74%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	24.74%	1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHM and EINC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

BBHM vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 53
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBHM vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBHM	EINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.04	+0.47

Drawdowns

BBHM vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBHM	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-87.55%	+77.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.28%	-5.44%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-44.29%	+41.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBHM	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	14.72%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	19.58%	-2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	25.43%	-7.97%

BBHM vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBHM vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.55%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBHM and EINC in my portfolio?

BBHM and EINC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBHM or EINC?

On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBHM or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBHM or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between BBHM and EINC?

BBHM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. BBHM tracks Actively Managed, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.45% for EINC.