BBHM vs. DCMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBHM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. BBHM is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

BBHM vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 34.49% return.

BBHM

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -0.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.89%
• YTD: 34.49%
• 6M: 33.53%
• 1Y: 42.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHM vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	1.78%	2.74%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	34.49%	-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHM and DCMT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

BBHM vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 76
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBHM vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBHM	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	1.20	-0.70

Drawdowns

BBHM vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBHM	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-11.95%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.28%	-3.46%	-1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-3.13%	+0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBHM	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	18.27%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	15.77%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	15.77%	+1.69%

BBHM vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBHM vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.73%	3.67%	1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBHM and DCMT in my portfolio?

BBHM and DCMT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBHM or DCMT?

On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBHM or DCMT?

DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBHM or DCMT?

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between BBHM and DCMT?

BBHM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BBH and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.66% for DCMT.