BBHM vs. COWG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and COWG (Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHM tracks the Actively Managed while COWG tracks the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWG.

Performance

BBHM vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than COWG's 7.76% return.

BBHM

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COWG

• 1D: -2.57%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 5.91%
• 1Y: 10.41%
• 3Y*: 22.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHM vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	3.11%	0.98%
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	7.76%	1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHM and COWG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

BBHM vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COWG

COWG Risk / Return Rank: 20
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 18
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBHM vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBHM	COWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.12	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.97	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.81	—

Drawdowns

BBHM vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum COWG drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and COWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBHM	COWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-23.60%	+13.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.79%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.05%	-4.21%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-3.27%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBHM	COWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	17.03%	+1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.20%	19.27%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.20%	19.27%	-1.07%

BBHM vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBHM vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.37%	0.32%	0.40%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBHM and COWG in my portfolio?

BBHM and COWG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBHM or COWG?

On fees, COWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBHM or COWG?

COWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBHM or COWG?

COWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between BBHM and COWG?

BBHM tracks Actively Managed, while COWG tracks Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.49% for COWG.