BBH vs. BIZD
BBH (VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BBH returned 7.05%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for BIZD. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBH charges 0.35%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
BBH vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBH achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BBH has underperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 7.05%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.75% annualized return.
BBH
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
BIZD
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- 6M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- -13.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
BBH vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF | 8.98% | 21.18% | -4.29% | 3.94% | -15.25% | 11.81% | 22.13% | 26.34% | -10.70% | 16.46% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -3.95% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBH and BIZD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.36 |
The correlation between BBH and BIZD shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BBH vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBH
BIZD
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BBH
BIZD
-
Basic Materials
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Communication Services
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Consumer Defensive
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Energy
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Financial Services
BBH
-
BIZD
Industrials
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Real Estate
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Technology
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Utilities
BBH
-
BIZD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBH vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
BBH
BIZD
BBH vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.90 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | -0.61 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | -0.97 | +8.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBH vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBH drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBH and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.70% | -55.44% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -22.22% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.74% | -22.56% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.86% | -22.91% | -16.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.86% | -55.44% | +15.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | -14.81% | +10.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -6.81% | -13.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 14.01% | -9.62% |
Volatility
BBH vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 4.93%. This indicates that BBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 4.93% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.74% | 15.06% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.64% | 18.73% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 17.49% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 21.78% | +0.32% |
BBH vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBH vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
BBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than BIZD's 11.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.27% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 11.85% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBH and BIZD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBH has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to BIZD (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBH dropped -72.70% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.75% vs 7.05% for BBH. On fees, BBH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 11.85%, compared with 0.46% for BBH.
BBH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. BBH tracks MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BBH and 12.86% for BIZD.
BBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBH and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer