PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEM vs. XC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BBEM vs. XC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBEM vs. XC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.56%32.43%5.61%6.01%
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
-3.53%18.19%5.49%15.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEM achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly higher than XC's -3.53% return.


BBEM

1D
3.57%
1M
-8.72%
YTD
3.56%
6M
8.15%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XC

1D
3.04%
1M
-8.43%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
0.10%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
11.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BBEM vs. XC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XC's 0.32% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BBEM vs. XC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEM
BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

XC
XC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEM vs. XC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBEMXCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.07

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

1.59

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.39

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.61

5.13

+4.48

BBEM vs. XC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the XC Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEM and XC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBEMXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.07

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.76

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between BBEM and XC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BBEM vs. XC - Dividend Comparison

BBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, less than XC's 12.42% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
5.63%5.86%2.73%1.94%0.00%
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
12.42%11.74%1.49%1.42%0.57%

Drawdowns

BBEM vs. XC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEM drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum XC drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEM and XC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-20.97%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-12.47%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.02%

-9.41%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.99%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.39%

-0.07%

Volatility

BBEM vs. XC - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) at 7.82%. This indicates that BBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.26%

7.82%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

10.76%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

16.80%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

15.73%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

15.73%

+0.98%