BBEM vs. STXE
BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - BBEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net while STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBEM returned 22.47%/yr vs 29.23%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBEM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
BBEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBEM achieves a 25.45% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 45.45% return.
BBEM
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 25.45%
- 6M
- 27.96%
- 1Y
- 49.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STXE
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 10.37%
- YTD
- 45.45%
- 6M
- 50.83%
- 1Y
- 80.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 25.45% | 32.43% | 5.61% | 6.01% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 45.45% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 11.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBEM and STXE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BBEM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBEM vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBEM
STXE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
BBEM
STXE
Financial Services
BBEM
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
BBEM
STXE
Industrials
BBEM
STXE
Communication Services
BBEM
STXE
Basic Materials
BBEM
STXE
Energy
BBEM
STXE
Consumer Defensive
BBEM
STXE
Healthcare
BBEM
STXE
Utilities
BBEM
STXE
Real Estate
BBEM
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
BBEM
STXE
BBEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.62 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 5.55 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 22.72 | -7.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 3.51 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 1.54 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
BBEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBEM drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum STXE drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEM and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.42% | -18.92% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -14.51% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.42% | -18.92% | +1.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -2.24% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.71% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 3.54% | -0.22% |
Volatility
BBEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is 8.57%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that BBEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 10.42% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.26% | 20.86% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.54% | 22.99% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 17.69% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 17.69% | -0.19% |
BBEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBEM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
BBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than STXE's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 4.65% | 5.86% | 2.73% | 1.94% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.85% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, BBEM and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXE has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to BBEM (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEM dropped -17.42% vs STXE's -18.92%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 29.23% vs 22.47% for BBEM. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 29.23% return vs 22.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for STXE.
BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 1.85% for STXE.
BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBEM and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBEM and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer