BBEM vs. RBIL
BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBEM returned 35.43% vs 3.81% for RBIL. Their -0.22 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BBEM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
BBEM vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBEM achieves a 19.98% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.61% return.
BBEM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- YTD
- 19.98%
- 1Y
- 35.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.48%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.52M | $2.48M | $2.94M | |
| $1.19M | $1.87M | $2.26M |
BBEM vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 19.98% | 26.16% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.61% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBEM and RBIL is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBEM vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
BBEM
RBIL
BBEM vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBEM | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 2.00 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 6.80 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 27.52 | -19.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBEM vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBEM drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEM and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBEM | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.42% | -0.56% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.37% | -0.56% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.36% | -0.22% | -7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -0.08% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 0.14% | +4.31% |
Volatility
BBEM vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.28%. This indicates that BBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBEM | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 0.28% | +7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.87% | 0.89% | +20.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.99% | 0.96% | +23.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 1.06% | +17.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 1.06% | +17.82% |
BBEM vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBEM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBEM vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
BBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than RBIL's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 4.83% | 5.86% | 2.73% | 1.94% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBEM and RBIL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBEM has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to RBIL (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEM dropped -17.42% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, BBEM leads with 35.43% vs 3.81% for RBIL. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BBEM has performed better with a 35.43% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.
BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 4.16% for RBIL.
BBEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBEM and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBEM and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer